AI Financial Advice Is Already Here, And It May Already Be Wrong
The Study That Should Have Everyone Paying Attention
A new study examined all of the major generative AI platforms and how they respond to personal finance prompts. The results were not encouraging. Researchers found significant variation in how different AI systems answer the same financial questions, and I quote directly from the findings: AI driven responses may sound confident, but can still be incomplete, leading, or incorrect.
Let that sink in. Confident. But wrong. Demographically biased. And inconsistent.
Now, I know what some of you are thinking. I do not use an AI advisor, so why does this matter to me? Here is why it matters. You are going to have one very soon whether you choose it or not.
The Private Equity Connection Nobody Is Talking About
Over the past several years I have been sounding the alarm on something that most financial media has completely ignored. Private equity firms have been buying up registered investment advisory firms at absolutely ridiculous valuations. These are the same firms that are supposed to be managing your retirement, your savings, your future.
When private equity overpays for something, they do not just sit on their hands. They cut corners. They look for ways to extract value, and the fastest, cheapest way to do that in financial advisory is to replace human advisors with technology. AI technology specifically.
You have seen this playbook run before in other industries:
- The plumbing company you trusted for fifteen years gets bought out, prices go up, quality goes down
- Your veterinary clinic gets absorbed, wait times double and the personal relationship disappears
- Your HVAC company changes hands, suddenly there are new fees for everything
- Your doctor is now employed by a corporate entity that prioritizes throughput over patient care
The same thing is happening inside the financial advisory world, and the end game is AI replacing your human advisor at firms that were sold to private equity at inflated prices and now need to cut costs aggressively.
Why This Should Concern Every Investor
I have been in this business for thirty years through Markowski Investments and have been doing this radio program for twenty six years. I have watched the financial industry pull a lot of moves on the American public. The dot com bubble, the discount trading firm explosion of the nineties, the 2008 collapse. I have called these things before they happened. And I am telling you right now, the AI financial advice wave is coming, and it is not coming because it is better for you. It is coming because it is cheaper for the firms deploying it.
Here is what investors need to understand:
- AI does not know your full situation. It is responding to prompts, not building a relationship with you over decades.
- Bias is baked in. The study found demographic bias in AI financial responses. That means the advice it gives may not be appropriate for your age, income level, or background.
- Confidence is not competence. These systems are designed to sound authoritative. Sounding right and being right are two completely different things.
- Accountability disappears. When a human advisor gives you bad advice, there are regulatory mechanisms in place. When an AI gives you bad advice, good luck figuring out who is responsible.
What You Can Do Right Now
The first thing I would tell any investor is to understand who actually owns and operates your advisory firm today. If it has changed hands in the past three to five years, ask questions. Ask what technology is being used in your account management. Ask whether your advisor is still a human being who answers to you or whether they are being assisted or replaced by automated systems.
I am not anti-technology. I am anti-deception. There is a massive difference between using technology as a tool to serve clients better and using it as a substitute for genuine fiduciary advice so that private equity can squeeze more margin out of a business they overpaid for.
The study confirming AI financial advice is inaccurate and biased is not a surprise to me. It is the starting pistol for a conversation the entire industry needs to have right now, before your retirement savings become someone else’s cost-cutting experiment.
