Two Sets of Tax Rules: One for Big Corporations, One for Everyone Else
The Myth of Equal Treatment Under Tax Law
I want to talk about something that genuinely makes my blood boil, and it should make yours boil too. We grow up being told that in America, everyone is equal under the law. That’s the promise. That’s the pitch. But when you start looking at how states and municipalities actually operate their tax systems, that promise evaporates fast.
Let me give you a concrete example straight out of the headlines. Ohio lawmakers, over a decade ago, decided to exempt tech companies from sales taxes on computer servers and data center equipment. On the surface, politicians sold it as an economic development win. Bring the big companies in, create jobs, look like heroes.
The result? That exemption cost Ohio taxpayers $1.5 billion in a single year.
Who Actually Pays the Price
Here is what nobody wants to say out loud. If you run a small accounting firm, a restaurant, or an investment advisory practice and you need computer servers to operate your business, you pay sales tax on that equipment. No exemption. No negotiation. No sweetheart deal. You just pay.
But a massive tech corporation that writes big checks to politicians? Different rules entirely.
This is not a left or right issue. This is a structural corruption issue that plays out in virtually every state in the country. Politicians use tax exemptions as bargaining chips to:
- Attract headline-grabbing corporate announcements
- Generate campaign contributions from the very companies receiving the breaks
- Create the illusion of economic leadership without doing any actual hard work
- Leave the small business owner holding the bag
The Constitutional Question Nobody Is Asking
I genuinely do not understand how this is legal. We are supposed to be equal under the law. That principle is foundational. So why does it not apply to tax law? Why can a state carve out a special class of taxpayer based on how large their political donation is or how many press releases their arrival generates?
The mom and pop shop that has been operating in that same town for two or three generations gets nothing. No abatement. No exemption. No negotiation. They just watch their tax dollars subsidize the competition.
Ohio voters are finally waking up to this. State lawmakers are now moving to repeal the data center exemption and renegotiate past deals. That is a start. But the deeper problem remains untouched.
What This Means for the Rest of Us
This is not just a philosophical argument. This has real financial consequences for small business owners and everyday taxpayers:
- Small businesses carry a disproportionate tax burden compared to large corporations in the same industry
- Local tax bases are eroded when major corporations receive exemptions, shifting costs to residents and smaller operators
- The businesses most likely to reinvest locally and build community wealth are the ones getting squeezed hardest
- Political donation size is effectively functioning as a tax rate determinant
No business should receive special tax treatment that is unavailable to its competitors. The moment we allow tax policy to be used as a political reward system, we have abandoned any pretense of a fair marketplace.
The rules should be the same for everyone. That is not a radical idea. It used to just be called America.
